Legal Opinion

United States v. Peet

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided June 30, 1932No. 581PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PHILLIPS, Circuit Judge.

Peet brought this action against the United States on a policy of war risk insurance. Trial by jury was duly waived and the action tried by the court. At the close of the evidence counsel for the United States moved for judgment in its favor upon the ground that the proof wholly failed to establish that Peet became totally and permanently disabled during the life of the policy. The court overruled such motion and entered judgment for Peet.

The evidence, considered in the light most favorable to Peet, established the following facts: He enlisted in the United States army…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Carter v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1931
  2. Ford v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1930
  3. White v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1931

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. United States v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1933
  2. United States v. FitzpatrickCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1933
  3. United States v. IveyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1933
  4. Thatenhorst v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1941
  5. United States v. FlippenceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1934

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API