Legal Opinion

Bussey v. Bussey

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided May 6, 1947No. 3655PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnston, J.

It cannot be doubted that so far as jurisdiction over the subject matter is concerned, a court has power to vacate its judgments for sufficient cause. “As a general proposition, courts have power to set aside, vacate, modify, or amend their judgments for good cause shown.” Adams v. Adams, 51 N. H. 388, 396. This must be so, since otherwise an injustice caused by a voidable judgment could not be corrected as there can be no collateral attack by another court. Wilson v. Otis, 71 N. H. 483.

“In this respect decrees in divorce suits stand upon the same footing as other judgments, both upon…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Lawrence v. NelsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1901
  3. McElrath v. McElrathSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
  4. Beavers v. BessIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
  5. Scheihing v. Baltimore & OHIO R. R.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1942

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Dugger v. LaulessOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Stritch v. StritchSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1965
  3. Bussey v. BusseySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1949
  4. Coburn v. First Equity Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1976
  5. Board of Trustees of Firemen's Relief & Pension Fund v. CottonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API