Bussey v. Bussey
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtKenison, J.
The Trial Court was confronted with a situation where either the granting or the dismissal of the petition would be prejudicial to an innocent party. The power of the court to vacate such decrees is not questioned, but generally, and in particular in this state, “there has always been a manifest reluctance to disturb a final judgment of divorce, especially after a second marriage involving the interests of third persons.” Adams v. Adams, 51 N. H. 388, 396. After a long lapse of time and change in status of persons upon faith in the validity of the decree, “this power will always be exercised…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Cote v. CoteSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1947
- Tuttle v. TuttleSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1938
- Bussey v. BusseySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1947
- Sandberg v. SandbergSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1924
- Melvin v. MelvinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1904
3Cited by8 opinions
- St. Pierre v. EdmondsUtah Supreme Court · 1982
- James Conant & a. v. Timothy O'Meara & a.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2015
- Attebery v. AtteberyNebraska Supreme Court · 1961
- Hemphill ex rel. Burns v. QuiggSupreme Court of Missouri · 1962
- Jewell v. JewellMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.