Callihan v. Board of Education of Robeson County
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtSeawell, J.
There is plenary evidence to sustain the finding that Callihan came to his death from an injury by accident arising out of and in the course of his employment, and our review on that point can go no further. Blevins v. Teer, 220 N. C., 135, 16 S. E. (2d), 659; Miller v. Caudle, ibid., 308, 17 S. E. (2d), 487. It is stipulated that plaintiffs are dependents.
The main controversy here is over the proper construction of Calli-han’s contract of employment. Does the fact that the ultimate source of two-thirds of the money expended by the local board in paying his salary is the State, or the State…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Blevins v. . TeerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
- Miller v. . CaudleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
3Cited by4 opinions
- Barber v. . MingesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
- Barber v. . MingesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
- Hunter v. Board of Trustees of the Retirement System of the City of WilmingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
- Hunter v. Board of Trustees of the Retirement System of the City of WilmingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944