Legal Opinion

Moseley v. City of Mountain Grove

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 6, 1975No. 9367PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiffs appeal from an order of the trial court sustaining defendants’ motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ petition on the ground that the petition fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. The order is appealable. Spires v. Edgar, 513 S.W.2d 372, 373[2] (Mo. banc 1974).

Where a petition is attacked by a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim, the mere conclusions of the pleader are not admitted. Tolliver v. Standard Oil Company, 431 S.W.2d 159, 162[2] (Mo.1968). But the facts alleged are taken to be true and the pleader is entitled to all favorable inferences fairly…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Spires v. EdgarSupreme Court of Missouri · 1974
  2. Newmeyer v. Mo. & Miss. R. R.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1873
  3. Johnson v. Great Heritage Life Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1973
  4. Higday v. NickolausMissouri Court of Appeals · 1971
  5. Parker v. ShermanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1970

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Missourians for Separation of Church & State v. RobertsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. American Drilling Service Co. v. City of SpringfieldMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. Schweig v. City of St. LouisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. Champ v. PoelkerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. Worlledge v. City of GreenwoodMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API