Legal Opinion
People v. Aldrich
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided March 19, 1895PublishedCited by 2 opinions
Exceptions before judgment from Allegan. (Padgham, J.) Respondent was convicted of unlawfully engaging in the liquor business. The facts are stated in the •opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.
Respondent was convicted for the violation of the law regulating the sale of intoxicating liquors, being Act No. 813, Laws of 1887. The complaint states that—
“On the 6th day of January, A..D. 1894, at the township of Wayland, and in the county aforesaid [Allegan], Ellis Aldrich, late of said township of Wayland, in said •county, was then and there a person whose business consisted of the sale of intoxicating liquors at retail, and was then and there engaged in, and did then and there unlawfully engage in, the business of selling and offering for sale intoxicating liquors at retail as a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. SchweiterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
- People v. KeeferMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
- Luton v. Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
- People v. RingstedMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
- Hodgman v. PeopleNew York Supreme Court · 1847
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Territory v. TakamineHawaii Supreme Court · 1913
- People v. CoullardMichigan Supreme Court · 1927