Legal Opinion

Territory v. Takamine

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided March 4, 1913PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal erom District Magistrate oe Wailuku.

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OP THE COURT BY

ROBERTSON, C.J.

Tbe defendant has appealed upon points of law from a judgment of conviction entered against him in the district court of Wailuku.

The charge upon which the defendant was prosecuted alleged, “That Takamine, at Wailuku, District of Wailuku, County of Maui, Territory of Hawaii, on the 20th day of December, A. D. 1912, did practice medicine on one Dobara, by burning a drug known as Mogusa on the person of the said Dobara, for the treatment of asthma, without having a license so to do as required by law,” etc.

The defendant demurred to the charge on the ground…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. CookSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  2. Harding v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1887
  3. State v. KendigSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
  4. Hull v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Barton v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1890

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. . BakerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  2. State v. HornCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
  3. Baldwin v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API