Legal Opinion

Luton v. Circuit Judge

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 25, 1888PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Application for mandamus to compel respondent to set aside an order quashing an information, and to proceed to the trial of the respondent. The facts and points of counsel are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.

An information was filed in the Newaygo cir•cuit court, at the March term thereof, 1888, against one Emory J. Bean, the material allegations of which are as follows:

“ That on the thirtieth day of November, A. D. 1887, one Emory J. Bean, a person engaged in a business consisting in part of the sale of drugs and medicines, at, to wit, in the township of Monroe, in said county of Newaygo, did on the thirtieth day of November, A. D. 1887, sell, furnish, and •deliver spirituous and intoxicating liquor, to wit, whisky, to said Harrison H. Bunting and one Charles Evans, at, to wit, the said township…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Robison v. MinerMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  2. People ex rel. Robison v. SwiftMichigan Supreme Court · 1886

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. People v. ColesMichigan Supreme Court · 1983
  2. People v. LorentzenMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
  3. People v. BullockMichigan Supreme Court · 1992
  4. State v. BeckerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1892
  5. People v. ElliottIllinois Supreme Court · 1916

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API