Legal Opinion

Brower v. Brown

Utah Supreme Court

Decided September 10, 1987No. 20553PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DURHAM, Justice:

Plaintiffs appeal from the trial court’s order granting defendants’ motion for summary judgment on the ground that the applicable statute of limitations barred plaintiffs’ causes of action.1 Justice Stewart did not participate in this matter. Judge Orme, Utah Court of Appeals, heard oral argument but was subsequently disqualified. Therefore, only four justices participated. Although a majority was reached as to plaintiff’s claims against Dr. Brown, the Court has failed to reach a majority on plaintiff’s claim against IHC. We are evenly divided, as appears from my opinion and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Foil v. BallingerUtah Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Christiansen v. ReesUtah Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Rice v. Sioux City Memorial Park Cemetery, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  4. Reiser Ex Rel. Reiser v. LohnerUtah Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Barlow Society v. Commercial Security BankUtah Supreme Court · 1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Daniels v. Gamma West Brachytherapy, LLCUtah Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Chapman Ex Rel. Chapman v. Primary Children's HospitalUtah Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Andreini v. HultgrenUtah Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Malone v. ParkerUtah Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Deschamps v. PulleyCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API