Hicks v. State
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.
The question propounded by the Court of Appeals must be answered in the affirmative, upon the following authorities: Penal Code (1910) § 231 is as follows: “Whoever, with intent to defraud the State or any person, shall falsely and fraudulently make, forge, alter, or counterfeit, or cause or procure to be falsely and fraudulently made, forged, altered, or counterfeited, or willingly aid or assist in falsely and fraudulently making, forging, altering, or counterfeiting, any . . writing obligatory, bill of exchange, promissory note, order for money or other thing of value, or any indorsement or…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. KroegerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1871
- Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
- Wilson v. South Park CommissionersIllinois Supreme Court · 1873
- People v. DickieNew York Supreme Court · 1891
- Hooper v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1891
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- The People v. KubanekIllinois Supreme Court · 1939
- Bowman v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
- United States v. JacksonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1962
- Hicks v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933