Legal Opinion
Williams v. State
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided June 26, 1924No. 7 Div. 495PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.
The indictment contained counts for forgery and for the uttering of a forged instrument. Code 1907, §§ 6909, 6910. Defendant was convicted of forgery in the second degree.
It is provided by statute (Code 1907, § 6910) that any person who, with intent to injure or defraud (1) falsely makes, alters, forges, counterfeits, or totally obliterates any instrument in writing catalogued in the statute, being or purporting to be the act of another, by which any right or interest in property is, or purports to be, transferred, conveyed, or in any way changed or affected, or (2) falsely makes, alters,…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Carter v. ChambersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1885
- Commonwealth v. CostelloMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. HallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888
- Alabama Great Southern Railroad v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1882
- Alabama Consolidated Coal & Iron Co. v. HealdSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Quick Service Box Co. v. St. Paul Mercury Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1938
- People v. NessethCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Sanders v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1964
- Tiarks v. First National Bank of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1966
- Williams v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1947
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.