Legal Opinion

People v. White

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 20, 1976PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Per curiam

With respect to the core issue on this appeal, we hold that a defendant charged with a dangerous drug offense must normally be accorded the right, with appropriate safeguards and under the supervision of the court, to pretrial discovery with respect to the alleged dangerous drug, including the right to make independent tests as to weight and composition.

After a jury trial defendant was convicted of criminal possession of a dangerous drug in the fourth degree (Penal Law, former § 220.15). The contraband, found in defendant’s apartment, was subjected to microscopic and chemical tests by the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. McArdleWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1973
  2. James v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1972
  3. United States v. BentvenaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1960
  4. United States v. AcarinoDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1967
  5. People v. Goetz, New York County Courts1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. People v. McGeeNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. People v. AlvarezNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. Dabbs v. VergariNew York Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Brown v. AppelmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  5. Commonwealth v. ArenellaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API