Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Arenella

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 24, 1982No. 600 & 1388PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAVANAUGH, Judge:

These two appeals are from judgments of sentence for possession with intent to deliver or delivery of marijuana in violation of The Controlled Substance, Drug, Device and Cosmetic Act, Act of ■ April 14, 1972, P.L. 233, No. 64, § 13(a)(30), as amended, 35 P.S. § 780-113(a)(30). Appellant Frank Arenella was convicted of one count; appellant Bruce Hunsinger of two counts. Their activities and their trials, in each case before a jury, were separate. However, their arrests resulted from the same undercover investigation of drug dealing in the Bloomsburg area, and the principal…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. StorySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Commonwealth v. RigginsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. Commonwealth v. ScottSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. United States v. Charles Kelly and Raymond ImpCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
  5. Warren v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1973

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. SnyderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  2. Commonwealth v. WoodSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  3. Commonwealth v. TilliaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  4. Commonwealth v. SchultzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. Commonwealth v. NeelySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API