Legal Opinion

United States v. Acarino

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided June 29, 1967No. 66 Cr. 48PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

WEINSTEIN, District Judge.

Defendant has moved pursuant to subdivision (f) of Rule 7, item (1) of subdivision (a) of Rule 16 and subdivision (b) of Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure for an order: 1) directing the United States Attorney to furnish the defendant with a Bill of Particulars and 2) allowing .defendant to inspect certain documents and objects.

The indictment is stated in the most general terms with few details. Count II is typical; it reads as follows:

“On or about the 22nd day of October 1965, within the Eastern District of New York, the defendant…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. GarssonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1923
  2. United States v. Robert L. YoungbloodCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Yates v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  2. United States v. FeolaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1987
  3. United States v. Patricia Ann Sullivan, and Carl Roger SpaderoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  4. People v. WhiteNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. United States v. Hoyt Albert Gaultney, United States of America v. Gary Keith SteagaldCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API