Legal Opinion
Turk v. Silberstein
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided March 24, 1998No. AC 16481PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SPEAR, J.
The defendant appeals from the judgment of the trial court setting aside a verdict for the defendant on the ground of juror misconduct. The defendant *224claims that the trial court’s action was improper because (1) it applied the wrong legal standard in assessing the evidence of juror misconduct, (2) its factual and legal conclusions were not supported by the evidence, and (3) public policy precludes persons from seeking out jurors after trial and soliciting information that could be used to attack the verdict. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
We glean the following…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- State v. RossSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- A-G Foods, Inc. v. Pepperidge Farm, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Potter v. Chicago Pneumatic Tool Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- State v. NewsomeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- State v. BladesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. OlahConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- O'Shea v. MignoneConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
- Baldwin v. JableckiConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- Komondy v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- Rivera v. Saint Francis Hospital & Medical CenterConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.