Legal Opinion
Bartlett v. Hawaiian Village, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 19, 1978No. Civ. 41284PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RACANELLI, P. J.
Appellants comprise a group of homosexual males who instituted civil litigation on their own behalf and all others similarly situated against respondent and its agents, dba The Club Baths of San Francisco, a public bath house patronized largely by homosexual men. The complaint seeks damages for claimed violations of the Unruh Civil Rights Act (Civ. Code, §§ 51 and 52) (hereafter Act) and injunctive relief. The class action was brought in behalf of nine subclasses of patrons who either have been or will be denied admission to The Club Baths premises solely by reason of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Vasquez v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- City of San Jose v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Daar v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1967
- Burks v. Poppy Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1962
- Collins v. RochaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Caro v. Procter & Gamble Co.California Court of Appeal · 1993
- Angelucci v. Century Supper ClubCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- Brown v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Corbett v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Rose v. Medtronics, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1980
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.