Legal Opinion
People v. Monahan
Criminal Court of the City of New York
Decided March 7, 1972PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtM. Marvin Berger, J.
The three defendants are charged with violating subdivision 6 of section 106 of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Law stating: “ No person licensed to sell alcoholic beverages shall suffer or permit any gambling on the licensed premises, or suffer or permit such premises to become disorderly
The defendants are not licensees. Monahan is employed as a bartender. The other two defendants appear to have been patrons of the establishment, the Moriarity and Reilly Tavern, of which the licensee is Daniel Moriarity.
In any event, the testimony of the arresting officer indicated that Monahan was engaged in…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People v. SchmidtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927
- People v. O'NeilAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
- Abrams v. BruckmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942
- People v. Corie, New York County Courts1949
- People v. FlanaganNew York City Magistrates' Court · 1934
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- People v. ShelleyAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1980
- People v. StentellaCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1975