Legal Opinion

People v. Flanagan

New York City Magistrates' Court

Decided September 29, 1934PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Aurelio,

City Magistrate. The complaint herein charges that the defendant did violate the provisions of section 106, subdivision 2, of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Law of this State (Laws of 1934, chap. 478), in that he did keep in the premises in question a number of bottles of liquor, none of which had affixed thereto the labels required by the rules of the liquor authority and the necessary Federal revenue and New York State excise stamps.

The evidence shows that on September 22, 1934, the arresting officer purchased from the defendant one-half pint of liquor for which he paid the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. SchmidtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Fowel v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1955
  2. People v. Corie, New York County Courts1949
  3. People v. MonahanCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API