Abrams v. Bruckman

Under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act petitioner seeks review of the State Liquor Authority’s determination canceling after a hearing petitioner’s restaurant liquor license and declaring forfeit a refund otherwise due. The facts are not in dispute. The issue is whether the evidence sustains a finding that the licensee, in violation of subdivision 6 of section 106 of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Law permitted gambling on the licensed premises on one occasion on March 6, 1941.

Petitioner, on renewal application March 1, 1941, received a year’s license to sell liquor, wines and beer for on…