Legal Opinion

Tingley v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 6, 1908No. Civ. No. 470PublishedCited by 4 opinions

APPLICATION for writ of review to annul an order of the superior court of Shasta County, refusing to vacate an order granting a writ of mandate. Charles M. Head, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtChipman, P. J.

It appears from the petition, stated as briefly as may be, that petitioners made certain repairs on the “Anderson Free Bridge,” in the county of Shasta, under contract with the board of supervisors, and the claim therefor was duly allowed and the county auditor duly notified to issue his warrants in payment of said claim; that some time prior thereto one Babcock had obtained a judgment in the superior court, for a sum in excess of said claim, against one J. M. Tingley, and that Babcock filed an authenticated transcript thereof with the auditor, after the latter had been notified to issue said…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Elliott v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Credits Commutation Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Faias v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  2. Howe v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  3. Patterson v. Board of Supervisors of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  4. State Ex Rel. Murphy v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API