Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Murphy v. Superior Court

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided October 5, 1926No. Civil No. 2563PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, J.

La the year 1926 the county assessor of Cochise county completed the assessment-roll of said county as required by law, and delivered it to the clerk of the board of supervisors. Included within said roll were many thousand acres of land, which were, and had been for many years, classified as “grazing and dry farming lands.” During the year 1925, and several years prior thereto, these lands had been assessed at three dollars per acre, hut in 1926 the assessor had reduced their valuation to two dollars. The board of supervisors, sitting as a board of equalization, met according to law and took…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Elliott v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Black v. BrinkleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1891
  3. State v. Superior Court of Pinal CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Yuma County v. Arizona & Swansea RailroadArizona Supreme Court · 1926
  5. State v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1923

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re Assessment of Kansas City Southern Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  2. Oglesby v. PoageArizona Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Dowd v. Estate of DowdIdaho Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Lockwood v. Superior Court of Navajo CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API