Legal Opinion
Stoffels v. SBC Communications, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Texas
Decided November 26, 2007No. 1:05-cr-00233PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
WILLIAM WAYNE, Senior District Judge.
Before the Court for consideration is Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment in the above numbered and styled civil action. (Docket No. 210.) Though difficult to decipher from its Motion and Reply, Defendant, at bottom, bases its argument upon differing incantations of three basic arguments: (1) the Concession is not an ERISA pension plan; (2) if the Concession were an ERISA pension plan, it would be impossible for the Concession to fulfill the requirements of ERISA; and (3) treating the Concession as an ERISA plan would be contrary to the purpose of…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Jose MEDINA-MUNOZ, Etc., Et Al., Plaintiffs, Appellants, v. R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY, Defendant, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- International Shortstop, Inc., and Sam Talkington v. Rally's, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Stoffels Ex Rel. SBC Telephone Concession Plan v. SBC Communications, Inc.District Court, W.D. Texas · 2008
- Boos v. AT & T, Inc.District Court, W.D. Texas · 2010