Legal Opinion

Abdullah Seifuddin Shabazz, Plaintiffs-Appellees/cross-Appellants v. Gary Gabry, Defendants-Appellants/cross-Appellees

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided August 22, 1997No. 96-1059, 96-1060PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SUHRHEINRICH, Circuit Judge.

In 1992 the State of Michigan amended its parole laws to postpone the initial mandatory parole review hearings of certain state prisoners and to reduce the frequency of their subsequent mandatory hearings. This prisoner class action suit, brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, challenges the retroactive application of the 1992 amendments as violative of the Ex Post Facto Clause of the United States Constitution. U.S. Const, art. 1, § 10, cl. 1. We conclude that it does not.

I. Background

The Michigan state legislature has frequently revised the laws governing parole. The…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Calder v. BullSupreme Court of the United States · 1798
  5. Collins v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Kenneth Foster v. Sharee BookerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
  2. Glover v. Parole BoardMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Boumediene, Lakhdar v. Bush, GeorgeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2007
  4. Akella v. Michigan Department of State PoliceDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1999
  5. People v. ScottMichigan Supreme Court · 2008

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API