Legal Opinion
City of San Antonio v. Texas Attorney General, the Hearst Corporation and Juli Branson
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)
Decided April 7, 1993No. 03-91-00461-CVPublished
1Opinion of the Court
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT OF TEXAS,
AT AUSTIN
NO. 3-91-461-CV
CITY OF SAN ANTONIO,
APPELLANT
vs.
TEXAS ATTORNEY GENERAL, THE HEARST CORPORATION,
AND JULI BRANSON,
APPELLEES
FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 167TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
NO. 474,803, HONORABLE W. JEANNE MEURER, JUDGE PRESIDING
In a declaratory-judgment action, the Attorney General of Texas and two intervenors, the Hearst Corporation and its employee Juli Branson, recovered summary judgment against the City of San Antonio. See Uniform Declaratory Judgments Act, Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. §§ 37.001-.011 (West 1986 &…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Johnson v. City of Fort WorthTexas Supreme Court · 1989
- Roark v. STALLWORTH OIL AND GAS, INCTexas Supreme Court · 1991
- Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. United North & South Development Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1942
- Commissioners Court of Caldwell County v. Criminal District AttorneyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1985
- Texas Department of Public Safety v. GilbreathCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.