Legal Opinion

Vaccaro v. Andresen

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided June 4, 1964No. 3373PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOOD, Chief Judge.

Michael P. Vaccaro, one of the appellants here, and appellee Andresen were officers and stockholders in a corporation engaged in the florist business. The corporation was in financial difficulties and on March 31, 1961, Vaccaro and his wife executed an “installment discount” note to a bank in the sum of $2,556. The net proceeds of the note amounted to $2,009.54 and Vaccaro paid $2,000 of it to the corporation. According to Vaccaro the note was executed and the money paid to the corporation at the request of Andresen, who orally guaranteed payment of the note. According to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Wells v. Alropa CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1936
  2. Pierce v. WrightCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  3. McMillan v. DozierSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952
  4. McNulty v. Medical Service of District of Columbia, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1962
  5. Allen v. AllenDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1957

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Murray v. Wells Fargo Home MortgageDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. Monroe Park v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Delaware · 1983
  3. Estate of Grant v. U.S. News & World Report, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 1986
  4. Beltway Paving Company, Inc. v. Prudential Insurance Company of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API