Legal Opinion

McNulty v. Medical Service of District of Columbia, Inc.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided January 10, 1962No. 2777PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAYTON, Judge.

In this suit by a physician for services performed for a medical service corporation, defendant pleaded the three-year statute of limitations which applies to simple contracts. Code 1961, § 12-201. Plaintiff contended that the contract between the parties was under seal and hence subject to a 12-year limitation under» the same statute. (Plaintiff’s services were performed more than three years but less than twelve, before this action was brought.) The case was tried on stipulated facts and from a ruling in favor of defendant, plaintiff has appealed.

The agreement was on a printed…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Brick v. Cohn-Hall-Marx Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1940
  2. Mindell v. GoldmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
  3. Wilson v. MundyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1925
  4. Rockwell v. Capital Traction Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1905
  5. Zeiss v. WursterCity of New York Municipal Court · 1931

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Murray v. Wells Fargo Home MortgageDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. Whittington v. Dragon Group, L.L.C.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2009
  3. Mayor of Federalsburg v. Allied Contractors, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  4. Gildenhorn v. Columbia Real Estate Title InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
  5. Crowder v. Master Financial, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2007

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API