Legal Opinion

Edmonds v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided September 26, 1924PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Bell Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Drury, Commissioner—

Affirming.

The appellant was convicted of the murder of Hiram Honeycutt, and his punishment fixed at imprisonment in the penitentiary for life.

The deceased, Hiram Honeycutt, his wife, Kate Honeycutt, and two little children lived in a small house in Slagtown, a suburb of Middlesboro. Mrs. Honeycutt was twenty-nine years of age. The deceased was probably twenty years her senior; he was nearsighted and at times was almost blind. On the night he was murdered, he and his wife and these two small children were sleeping in a bed in this little home. Hoiv…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. King v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1892
  2. State v. ByrdMontana Supreme Court · 1910
  3. May v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
  4. Meece v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1880
  5. Binns v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1874

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Morgan v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
  2. Duvall v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
  3. Davis v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1942
  4. Vinson v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1952
  5. Asher v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API