Central Iron & Steel Co. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
LITTLETON, Judge.
This ease again comes before the court on defendant’s motion for a new trial, in which it is contended that the conclusion of law and judgment in favor of plaintiff, pursuant to the findings of fact and opinion of the court heretofore rendered on June 19, 1933 (4 F. Supp. 113), should be set aside, vacated, and the petition dismissed for the reasons that, first, the court is without jurisdiction because the Commissioner of Internal Revenue granted special assessment under section 210' of the Revenue Act of 1917 (40 Stat. 307); and, second, if the court has jurisdiction in a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Williamsport Wire Rope Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Heiner v. Diamond Alkali Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Heiner, Collector of Internal Revenue, v. Diamond Alkali Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Diamond Alkali Co. v. HeinerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1932
- Diamond Alkali Co. v. HeinerDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1930
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Cuban-American Sugar Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1939
- Michigan Iron & Land Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1935
- Joseph Joseph & Bros. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1934
- Johnston-Crews Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1941
- W. H. Bradford & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1934
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.