Legal Opinion
United States v. Aero Mayflower Transit Co.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided October 31, 1986No. Misc. 86-281PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHARLES R. RICHEY, District Judge.
Before this Court is the United States’ petition for summary enforcement of administrative subpoenae and respondents’ motion to quash the subpoenae or for leave to take discovery. After thoroughly considering the able oral and extensive written arguments, as well as the many supporting affidavits, this Court concludes that respondents have not sustained their heavy burden of proof. In consequence, the Court must order enforcement of the subpoenae forthwith.
BACKGROUND
The Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice has been investigating alleged…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- United States v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Laird v. TatumSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. Morton Salt Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- United States v. LaSalle National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Endicott Johnson Corp. v. PerkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. Aero Mayflower Transit Co., Inc., Global Van Lines, IncCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
- Martin v. GardDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1993
- Inspector General v. Banner Plumbing Supply, Co., Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1998
- Resolution Trust Corp. v. ThorntonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1992
- Doyle v. U.S. Postal ServiceDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1991