Legal Opinion
In re Friedman
New York Supreme Court
Decided October 22, 1924PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBijur, J.
This is a motion made on behalf of Morris A. Friedman for a rehearing on newly-discovered facts of a motion previously made on behalf of Harry P. Friedman and granted by me vacating an award in arbitration between said parties. The agreement of arbitration provided that the three arbitrators selected should determine the various controversies arising out of the previous business relations of the Friedmans and should also collect certain moneys derived from said business and apportion the same in connection with their final award. Harry P. Friedman moved to vacate the award on the ground of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. Oregon Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Terry v. . MungerNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Schenck v. . State Line Telephone Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1924
- Kley v. . HealyNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Belmont v. Erie Railway Co.New York Supreme Court · 1869
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re the Arbitration between Friedman & FriedmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
- JI Case Company v. McDonaldIdaho Supreme Court · 1955
- William H. Van Vleck, Inc. v. KleinNew York Supreme Court · 1966
- People v. GreenNew York Supreme Court · 1986