Legal Opinion · Dissent

Bunnell v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF UTAH

Utah Supreme Court

Decided July 28, 1987No. 860196Published

1DissentZimmerman, Justice

I agree with the majority that the administrative law judge plainly erred in excluding evidence in reliance on the hearsay rule. We have held explicitly that a strict application of the rules of evidence is inappropriate in such hearings. E.g., Gardner v. Edward Gardner Plumbing & Heating, Inc., 693 P.2d 678, 681-82 (Utah 1984). I also think the testimony excluded was relevant to the issues put before him. However, I cannot conclude that the erroneous exclusion of the evidence was harmful.

There was ample evidence before the administrative law judge to support his ruling that plaintiff had…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. KnightUtah Supreme Court · 1987
  2. State v. ScottSupreme Court of Kansas · 2008
  3. State v. LoganSupreme Court of Kansas · 1984
  4. Davidson v. Oregon Government Ethics CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Mattingly v. CharnesColorado Court of Appeals · 1985

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API