Legal Opinion
Mattingly v. Charnes
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided April 18, 1985No. 84CA0288PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, Judge.
Paul R. Mattingly appeals the trial court’s judgment affirming the Department of Revenue’s (department) revocation of his driver’s license pursuant to the express consent law. Sections 42-2-122.1(l)(a) and 42-2-103(3)(c), C.R.S. (1984 Repl.Vol. 17). We affirm the trial court’s decision.
On July 3, 1983, Mattingly was charged with driving while under the influence after refusing to submit to a chemical test for blood alcohol content. The arresting officer prepared and served Mattingly with a notice of revocation or denial which included a provision for requesting a hearing.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Edwards v. SteeleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- First National Bank v. Oklahoma Savings & Loan BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
- Survivors of Wallace Medeiros v. Maui Land & Pineapple Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1983
- De Luca v. Board of Supervisors of Los Angeles CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Lopez v. Motor Vehicle Division, Dept. of RevenueSupreme Court of Colorado · 1975
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Fairbanks N. Star Bor. v. Rogers & BablerAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
- Wilson v. HillColorado Court of Appeals · 1989
- State v. FIFTEEN IMPOUNDED CATSSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
- Zavala v. City and County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
- Alford v. TiptonColorado Court of Appeals · 1991
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.