Wise v. Mohawk Rubber Co.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Complaint; from city court of Sandersville—Judge Jordan. April 23, 1918.
1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, J.
1. Where one holds another out as his special agent, the principal is bound by the agent’s apparent authority to do the particular thing thus authorized, as well as to d'o any and all things usual and necessary, and to employ all usual and necessary means that may be reasonably required, in the due, proper, and ordinary performance of the particular purpose of the appointment. Civil Code (1910), § 3595; Bass Co. v. Granite City Co., 119 Ga. 124 (45 S. E. 980) ; Raleigh &c. Railroad Co. v. Pullman Co., 122 Ga. 700, 705, (50 S .E. 1008). But a person dealing with such an agent takes the risk as…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Napier v. StrongCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
- Raleigh & Gaston Railroad v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Bass Dry Goods Co. v. Granite City Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1903
3Cited by9 opinions
- Mullins v. DuVallCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1920
- Bruce v. Calhoun First National BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
- Fireman's Fund Insurance v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930
- Rothberg v. Manhattan Coil Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1951
- Dannenberg Co. v. HughesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.