Rothberg v. Manhattan Coil Corp.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtTownsend, J.
(After stating the foregoing facts.) The petition as finally amended set out a contract to procure a buyer for the defendant’s real property; the commission to be charged upon completion thereof; the fact that the plaintiff was a licensed broker entitled to the commissions charged, and that he did procure one ready, willing and able to purchase the property on the terms stipulated. A real-estate broker is entitled to collect his commission under these circumstances, whether or not the sale is actually consummated. See Code, § 4-213. In consequence, the sole question for decision was whether…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Conney v. Atlantic Greyhound Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1950
- Fitzgerald Cotton Oil Co. v. Farmers Supply Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
- Garmany v. LawtonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
- Tingle v. MaddoxSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
- Green v. SpiresSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Atlanta Limousine Airport Services, Inc. v. RinkerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
- Knowles v. GwynnSupreme Court of Georgia · 1968
- Seibels, Bruce & Co. v. H. H. Burnet & Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
- The DRAGON CORPORATION v. SyphersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
- Murphy v. HOSANNA YOUTH FACILITIES, INC.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2010
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.