Bruce v. Calhoun First National Bank
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Marshall, Judge.
This appeal contests the legal accuracy and factual propriety of trial court instructions on express and implied warranties of Article 2 of the Uniform Commercial Code.
The suit arose out of . a sale by appellees (defendants below) of some 76 rolls of mixed types of broadloom carpet to appellants (plaintiffs below). The carpets were "close-out” or "discontinued styles” which the appellees had on hand after sale of their carpet company to another company. Appellees hired an agent named Eller to advertise and arrange for the sale of the carpet. On the day of the sale the rolls of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Nathan v. DuncanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
- Berger v. Plantation Pipeline Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
- Mendel v. PinkardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
- Metropolitan Transit System, Inc. v. BarnetteCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
- Jackson v. MatlockCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1953
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Royal Typewriter Company, a Division of Litton Business Systems, Inc., a Corporation v. Xerographic Supplies Corporation, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
- Fiat Auto U. S. A., Inc. v. HollumsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
- Smith v. FinchSupreme Court of Georgia · 2009
- Jones v. MarcusCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
- Leica Geosystems, Inc. v. L.W.S. Leasing, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 2012
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.