Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. Seegars

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 4, 1991Published

1Dissent

Kassal and Smith, JJ.,

dissent in a memorandum by Smith, J., as follows: Because I believe the defendant was convicted by overwhelming evidence following a trial which was fair, I dissent. First, in the context of this case, the showup identification procedure at the hospital was neither an error nor unfair. Even if it was error, the error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. (People v Crimmins, 36 NY2d 230 [1975].) Second, the charge as a whole was entirely fair.

Briefly stated, the evidence was as follows. On April 3, 1984 the complainant, a 69-year old woman, was grabbed around her neck,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. CrimminsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. People v. HallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  3. People v. RomanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  4. People v. ShawAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API