Legal Opinion

In Re the Marriage of Hagy

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided July 11, 1978No. 2417-3PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGreen, J.

The 21-year marriage of Mary and Raymond Hagy ended in divorce in 1970, but the divorce decree did not mention Mr. Hagy's contingent employee pension. Over 6 years later, Mrs. Hagy sued for partition of this pension. After hearing testimony the trial court dismissed her suit, and she appeals.

One issue is presented for our review: Did the trial court err when it refused to treat the parties as tenants in common in a contingent pension that was not specifically referred to in their 1970 divorce decree?

During his marriage to Mary Hagy, Mr. Hagy was an employee of Kaiser Aluminum and Chemical…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Thorndike v. Hesperian Orchards, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1959
  2. In Re Marriage of BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Wilder v. WilderWashington Supreme Court · 1975
  4. DeRevere v. DeRevereCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1971
  5. Payne v. PayneWashington Supreme Court · 1973

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Barros v. BarrosCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1983
  2. Myser v. MyserCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978
  3. Welsch v. GerhardtTexas Supreme Court · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API