Legal Opinion
City of Manchester v. Huard
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided February 28, 1973No. 6493PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGrimes, J.
The issue presented by this workmen’s compensation case is whether injuries received by a uniformed Manchester policeman while arresting a person for drunkenness during the policeman’s off-duty job at a private restaurant called Mrs. Bea’s arose out of and in the course of his employment with the city.
The labor commissioner ruled that Francis Huard, a regular Manchester police officer, was entitled to workmen’s compensation benefits from the city of Manchester. The city appealed and received a hearing de novo before the superior court. RSA 281:3V I (Supp. 1972). The trial court found for…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- LaBonte v. National Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1970
- Newell v. MoreauSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1947
- Mathurin v. City of PutnamSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1950
- Walter v. HagianisSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1952
- Henderson v. Sherwood Motor Hotel, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1964
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Heinz v. Concord Union School DistrictSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
- LaVallie v. Simplex Wire & Cable Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1992
- Cooper v. City of DaytonOhio Court of Appeals · 1997
- Domanoski v. Borough of FanwoodNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1989
- City of Hialeah v. WeberDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.