Legal Opinion
Domanoski v. Borough of Fanwood
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided December 29, 1989PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
237 N.J. Super. 452 (1989)
568 A.2d 123
DONALD DOMANOSKI, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT,
v.
BOROUGH OF FANWOOD, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.
DONALD DOMANOSKI, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT,
v.
THE GREAT ATLANTIC & PACIFIC TEA COMPANY, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued December 12, 1989.
Decided December 29, 1989.
Before Judges PRESSLER, LONG and LANDAU.
Robert Silver argued the cause for appellant (Michals, Wahl, Silver & Leitner, attorneys for appellant).
Israel Gazek argued the cause for respondent Domanoski.
Robert J. Young argued the cause for respondent Borough of Fanwood…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Marcus v. Eastern Agricultural Ass'n, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959
- Marcus v. Eastern Agricultural Ass'n, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
- Chickachop v. Manpower, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1964
- Blessing v. T. Shriver and Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
- Conway v. Mister Softee, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1968
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Lovelace v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Murin v. Frapaul Const. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1990
- Cattlemen's Steakhouse, Inc. v. WaldenvilleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2013
- Communications Workers of America v. Atlantic County Ass'n for Retarded CitizensNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1991
- Prince George's County v. MoralesCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2016
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.