Legal Opinion

Walter v. Hagianis

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided March 4, 1952No. 4096PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKenison, J.

The evidence in this case is confined to three witnesses, the plaintiff, the named defendant and the surgeon who examined and operated upon the plaintiff who testified by deposition. Most of the facts are not in dispute. No witness contradicted the testimony given by any other witness in this proceeding. The tray that the plaintiff was carrying on August twenty-eighth was loaded with dishes not merely from one table but from “all the tables in the dining room.” The employer, knowing that trays were heavy for the waitresses, used to carry them to the kitchen but testified that “most of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Claim of Masse v. James H. Robinson Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1950
  2. Claim of Carpenter v. Sibley, Lindsay & Curr Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1951

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Bryant Stave & Heading Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1956
  2. New Hampshire Supply Co. v. SteinbergSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979
  3. Appeal of BriggsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1994
  4. Neylon v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
  5. Burnham v. DowningSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1984

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API