Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Merseles

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided December 3, 1936PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Slater, S.

This is a construction proceeding in which the exercise of the power of appointment is questioned,

The will of Theodore F. Merseles gives the residuary estate to trustees upon express trusts, one-half thereof to be held for the widow’s life. Upon her death such portion is to be divided into two equal parts and “ one of such parts shall be added to and become a part of each of the separate trusts hereby created for the benefit of each of my sons hereinafter named.” One-quarter of the residuary estate is to be invested for the benefit of the son, Herbert E. Merseles, for his life. “…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Cutting v. . CuttingNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  2. Simpson v. Trust Co. of AmericaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
  3. West v. WestAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
  4. In Re the Accounting of RoseNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  5. In re the Estate of HaymanNew York Surrogate's Court · 1929

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rosenthal v. First National BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1968
  2. In re the Estate of StevensonNew York Surrogate's Court · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API