Legal Opinion
In Re the Accounting of Rose
New York Court of Appeals
Decided April 7, 1931PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order affirmed, with costs to the respondents filing briefs in this court payable out of the estate; no opinion.
Concur: Cardozo, Ch. J., Pound, Crane, Lehman, Kellogg, O’Brien and Hubbs, JJ.
2Cited by16 opinions
- In re the Estate of BerwindNew York Surrogate's Court · 1943
- In re BlumenstielAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
- In re the Estate of CarrollNew York Surrogate's Court · 1934
- In re the Estate of TrotterNew York Surrogate's Court · 1940
- In re the Estate of SheiferNew York Surrogate's Court · 1942
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.