Legal Opinion

Appleton v. Hickey

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided March 16, 1972No. 7648; No. 2108PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMason, J.

This is an action in context to recover for labor and parts for repairs to the defendant’s automobile and for its storage. The defendant in his answer admits the liability for the labor and parts for repair and says that any liability he has for storage of his automobile is a matter of law for determination by the court.

The defendant filed a motion for judgment on undisputed facts under G.L. c. 231, § 59, alleging that the findings of fact in a prior pro*19ceeding show affirmatively that there is no genuine issue of material fact and nothing to be decided except questions of law. The defendant…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Gordon v. American Tankers Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lane v. SmithMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1975
  2. Canterbury Construction Corp. v. HaneyMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1989
  3. Eismann v. CoopermanMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1989
  4. Exchange Street Auto Body, Inc. v. StocktonMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1982
  5. Schultz v. Sea Lady, Inc.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API