Legal Opinion

Crummel v. Nemaha County

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 11, 1929No. 26344PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEberly, J.

This is an action in equity praying for a mandatory injunction to require the defendant board of county commissioners to provide an adequate waterway under a certain bridge situated on road No. 5 of Nemaha county, known as the Brownville-Auburn road. There was a judgment and finding for the plaintiffs, from which the defendants appeal.

The plaintiffs are owner and tenant respectively of an 80-acre tract of land north of and adjacent to the road in question. A stream of water rises about four miles northeast of plaintiffs’ land and flows in a southwestern direction over and across this land and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Roe v. Howard CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Jacobson v.Van BoeningNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Baumgartner v. BradtIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Flesner v. SteinbruckNebraska Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Smith v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1908

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Mader v. MettenbrinkNebraska Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Leaders v. Sarpy CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Faught v. Dawson County Irrigation Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Webb v. Platte Valley Public Power & Irrigation DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Wilson Concrete Company v. County of SarpyNebraska Supreme Court · 1972

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API