Legal Opinion

Chesson v. Hungerford

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided November 25, 1969No. 2940PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOOD, Judge.

Plaintiffs, Gilbert Albert Chesson, Jr., and Sherman Fontenot, instituted this suit for damages against Adam A. Hunger-ford, alleging as a basis for their claim that defendant defamed them. Hunger-ford answered and filed a reconventional demand for damages, alleging that plaintiffs assaulted and struck him with a dangerous weapon, causing him to sustain physical injuries and other damages. The case has not come up for trial on its merits. We granted a writ of certiorari, however, to review an interlocutory order of the trial court limiting the scope of a discovery examination'…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Samuel Goldwyn, Inc. v. United Artists CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1940
  3. Laverett v. Continental Briar Pipe Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1938
  4. Boldt v. SandersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
  5. Baim & Blank, Inc. v. Philco Distributors, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1957

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Viator v. SonnierLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1978
  2. Nicholson v. Holloway Planting Company, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1973
  3. Bonck v. Plimsoll Club, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1971
  4. Sass v. National Union Fire Insurance Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API