Legal Opinion

Mayer v. Livingston

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 5, 1958PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRobert Doscher, J.

Plaintiff brings this action to enforce restrictive covenants and to restrain and enjoin defendant from maintaining Ms premises in alleged violation of the covenants., Defendant’s premises, a bMlding constructed for use as a one-family dwelling, is located in that part of the city of New Rochelle known as Rochelle Heights. This park area, developed in accordance with uniform covenants and restrictions attached to and running with the land, has heretofore been held to be strictly residential with one-family dwellings therein. Other uses have been enjoined (Todd v. North Ave. Holding Corp., 121…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gallon v. HussarAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
  2. Todd v. North Avenue Holding Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1923
  3. McDonald v. SpangNew York Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Todd v. North Avenue Holding Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Southampton Civic Club v. CouchTexas Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Brady v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  3. Southampton Civic Club v. CouchTexas Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Southampton Civic Club v. CouchTexas Supreme Court · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API