Legal Opinion
Bailey v. Hayman
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided November 26, 1941PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBaeNHIll, J.
Upon tbe issues submitted tbe court instructed tbe jury as follows :
“These issues go band in band and I see no reason to talk about them severally and every reason to talk about them, one in conjunction with tbe other.” “Tbe burden of these two issues is upon tbe plaintiffs to satisfy you that tbe defendant is not sole seized of this property, and to satisfy you that they are tenants in common with tbe defendant in this tract of land contended for in this action along with tbe plaintiffs.”
While tbe second issue, under tbe pleadings and evidence, is tbe one that should be submitted to tbe…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Withers v. . LaneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
- North Carolina Self Help Corp. v. BrinkleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
- State v. . HartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
- Fourth National Bank v. McArthurSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
- State v. . RhinehartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. CanipeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Hyder v. ASHEVILLE STORAGE BATTERY COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- Alexander v. . Cedar WorksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
- Andrews v. AndrewsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- State v. . BentonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.