State v. . Benton
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.
The sufficiency of the indictment is challenged by motion in arrest of judgment, because it fails to allege the use of “force” in the accomplishment of the assault. S. v. Johnson, ante, 266; S. c., ante, 671. It has been decided that the words “by force,” or some equivalent expression, must be used in an indictment for rape. G. S., 14-21; S. v. Johnson, 67 N. C., 55. Whether the instant bill is sufficient need not now be determined, since a new trial must be ordered on other grounds, and the solicitor can easily eliminate any objection by sending a new bill to the grand jury. It is desirable…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- State v. . BealSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
- Withers v. . LaneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
- State v. . HartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
- State v. . JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1872
- State v. . JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1872
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- State v. BlackmonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
- State v. . ThompsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
- State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
- Belk v. SchweizerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- Stanback v. StanbackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.