Horace Mann Insurance Co. v. Peters
Colorado Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge CRISWELL.
In this declaratory judgment action, plaintiff, Horace Mann Insurance Company, appeals from an order of the trial court denying its motion for summary judgment, declaring that it was obliged to defend defendant Robert Peters in certain federal court litigation commenced against Peters by the other defendant, Jane Doe, through her parents Ann and Sam Doe, and awarding costs and attorney fees to defendant Peters. We reverse.
With respect to the issues addressed by the trial court and now presented to us, there are no disputed issues of material fact. The undisputed facts…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Hecla Mining Co. v. New Hampshire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1991
- James W. McCarty v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
- Simon v. Shelter General Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1992
- Feiger, Collison & Killmer v. JonesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Fire Insurance Exchange v. BentleyColorado Court of Appeals · 1998
- Pompa v. American Family Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- Colorado Intergovernmental Risk Sharing Agency v. Northfield Insurance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2008
- Flannery v. Allstate InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1999
- Pueblo Bancorporation v. Lindoe, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2002
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.