Legal Opinion

Goodrich v. City National Bank & Trust Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 7, 1935No. Docket No. 84, Calendar No. 38,003PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFead, J.

George Johnson and Rose Goodrich were married in 1895. Each owned property. In 1897 each made a will with the other as sole beneficiary, subject only to possibility and survival of children. Johnson died in January, 1933, leaving his widow his sole heir at law. Mrs. Johnson died in October, 1933, leaving plaintiffs Goodrich as her heirs at law.

In 1931 Johnson lost the sight of one eye and the other was imperiled. He wanted to put some of his property in the hands of ánother to handle for him. He was concerned about his wife’s intense devotion to a church and was afraid she would make…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Burnet v. GuggenheimSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Van Cott v. . PrenticeNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
  3. Kelly v. ParkerIllinois Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Jones v. Old Colony Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
  5. Warsco v. Oshkosh Savings & Trust Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1924

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. National Shawmut Bank v. JoyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
  2. Cleveland Trust Co. v. WhiteOhio Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Dodge v. Detroit Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Osius v. DingellMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Welch v. CrowSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2009

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API